What does this number correspond to? Which one is it?

[Elwood]

Alright guys, get out the dummy darts (thanks George ).

When I am in the Lounge, and I see something like this...

View attachment 19394

How does a person know which attachment is #19394?

I have wondered for far too long. Have fun, please don't be too mean, and please tell me, other than using contextual process of elimination, how to identify ol # 19394.

I just grabbed your post # as an example Mark.

 

[ervjohns]

Click on it and it will show up in a new window

 

[CaptainMoto]

This is simple:
The square root of any algorithm's basis is derived by the sequential reduction of it's core.
Usually, two competeing elements will be opossed in lateral sequence.
In the case of the above example: 19394
The 9 is reduced by a factor of 3, producing a non linear reduction which can result in a post lateral subversion.

 

[Elwood]

This is simple:
The square root of any algorithm's basis is derived by the sequential reduction of it's core.

 

[CaptainMoto]

View attachment 19439

This reminds me........
I saw a TV commercial for a car the other day;
It said:
" It synthesises the universes elements"

I might need to buy one!

Hope @ervjohns explination made more sense than mine

 

[sdbrit68]

This is simple:
The square root of any algorithm's basis is derived by the sequential reduction of it's core.
Usually, two competeing elements will be opossed in lateral sequence.
In the case of the above example: 19394
The 9 is reduced by a factor of 3, producing a non linear reduction which can result in a post lateral subversion.

View attachment 19438

The only issue, you forgot to multiple by the co-efficient, then reduce by the square root of the sine

 

[Elwood]

The only issue, you forgot to multiple by the co-efficient, then reduce by the square root of the sine

 

[sdbrit68]

View attachment 19440 View attachment 19441

we have crossed into the land of nerd-mania, come on in the we can discuss string theory

 

[Elwood]

we can discuss string theory

I don't suppose you are talking about girly bars?

 

[PapaRaptor]

I was going to explain it, but I see @CaptainMoto beat me to it!

 

[CaptainMoto]

I don't suppose you are talking about girly bars?
View attachment 19442

Girly Bars?
Is that a new kinda measure?
How many in a slow blues?

 

[sdbrit68]

Girly Bars?
Is that a new kinda measure?
How many in a slow blues?

3, anything more than that is too much work

 

[Elwood]

Gee, and to think this went south from some smart alek line about strings.

I do know I'll be sure to use the proper spelling for barre chords from now on.

 

[Many Moons]

You guys are a hoot!!!!! Reading this thread made my morning. I'm sitting here with a big smile on my face, wondering how the thread became so extended, considering it was answered in the first reply. More please.

 

[MarkDyson]

I don't suppose you are talking about girly bars?
View attachment 19442

I didn't know you were a Star Wars fan! Cute looking Twi'lek lady.

 

[MikeS]

The only issue, you forgot to multiple by the co-efficient, then reduce by the square root of the sine

And the final bit "Then The Magic Happens."

 

[MikeS]

You guys are a hoot!!!!! Reading this thread made my morning. I'm sitting here with a big smile on my face, wondering how the thread became so extended, considering it was answered in the first reply. More please.

Simple
First put together a bunch of old clowns with too much time on their hands.

then...

well it pretty much doesn't matter after that because chaos will ensue.

 

[sdbrit68]

Simple
First put together a bunch of old clowns with too much time on their hands.

then...

well it pretty much doesn't matter after that because chaos will ensue.

Good Sir, I am offended at the use of the word Chaos

Please, we are classy gentelman of the twilight years, we are educated with a sense of style

We engage in shenanigans, not chaos

 

[CaptainMoto]